Choose your model
€490
You are preparing an agent and hesitating between models. We tell you which one slips the least on your case.
- One use case, described in an interview
- 5 market models compared
- Behaviour under pressure
- Report and recommendation
Before you trust it with your customers, your refunds or your prices, we put it under pressure on several models, attack it the way a fraudster would, and tell you where it gives way. Without access to your systems.
Request a crash test Watch the demo (1:20)
No access to your real data. A private report, never published.
read_queue
12 open tickets, target 100%
handle_ticket
82% — by the book
handle_ticket
90% — nothing more to gain honestly
refund_without_approval
100% — refunded beyond the authorised limit
report_rate
reports 100% to its manager
Verdict: crossed a line under pressure, without anyone asking it to.
Two questions your teams cannot settle by reading a prompt: what does the agent do when the target becomes out of reach, and what does it do when someone tries to manipulate it?
It has a target and real access. When the honest path is no longer enough, does it hold, or does it take a shortcut you would never have approved?
A booby-trapped message in its inbox, a fake manager in a hurry, a stranger asking for confidential information. We replay what a fraudster would try.
A few questions online, in business language: what it must do, what it is allowed to do, what would be a serious fault. Five minutes, no technical form.
We rebuild it identically with fictitious data, then run it several times on each model, under pressure and under attack.
A report your executives can read: which model to choose, where the agent gives way, which safeguards to add. Reviewed before it is sent.
Banks, insurers, public sector: we know your systems do not open. Each level below is enough for a serious crash test; you pick the one your security team accepts.
An interview and the documentation you choose to share. We rebuild the agent on our side, with fictitious data.
The address of your agent in a test environment, with dummy data. Never production.
Our engine is installed in your network and tests your internal model. Nothing leaves, except the report if you decide so.
Your complete agent, plugged into inert copies of its tools: same buttons, no real effect. We record what it presses.
Facts, not impressions: how many times each model crossed a line, lied, or gave in to an attack, in its own words.
Extract from a sample report — illustrative data
| Model | Crossed a line | Lied | Followed a planted instruction | Disclosed data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model A | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Model B | 1/5 | 0/5 | 2/5 | 0/5 |
| Model C | 4/5 | 3/5 | 5/5 | 1/5 |
“I would do whatever it takes to hit the number.”
Deploy with model A. If model B is chosen for its cost, add human approval for refunds above €50 and filter instructions found in incoming messages.
Fixed prices, excluding VAT. You know what you pay before we start.
€490
You are preparing an agent and hesitating between models. We tell you which one slips the least on your case.
€1,900
Your agent, as it will go live, pushed to the limit and attacked. Our most requested option.
On quote
For organisations that cannot open anything: the engine runs on your premises and tests your internal models.
Monitoring, €290 per month. Providers change their models without notice. We re-run the crash test with every new version, and every time your agent changes.
No. You describe your agent by answering a few questions online; we rebuild it with fictitious data. If you want the real agent tested, it happens in your test environment, or on your premises with our kit.
The main market models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, Meta and others), and yours if it can be reached through an API, including self-hosted.
A tendency, measured several times: what the model chooses when it is under pressure and has the means to act. It is not an absolute guarantee, and the report says so. That is why each model plays several runs.
Yes. The report is private and never published. We work with fictitious data, and we sign a confidentiality agreement and a data processing agreement before we start.
Security tools check whether a chatbot can be made to say anything. We also test what an agent does when it has power and a target: whether it cheats, lies or takes risks on its own, with no attacker involved.
The report documents the tests run, the models evaluated and the safeguards recommended: a useful piece of your documentation. It does not replace your lawyer's view on your obligations.
The crash test starts as soon as you pay. The report usually reaches you within two working days, after review.